The Supreme Court ruled that the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) alone can investigate judges’ misconduct. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail delivered an 11-page verdict stressing that judges cannot hold contempt proceedings against their peers. He warned that allowing such actions would create internal conflicts and weaken the judiciary’s credibility.
Read more: Dar at OIC Demands Permanent Gaza Ceasefire
The judgment stated that all judges in superior courts have equal power and status. None can claim superiority or punish another. Justice Mandokhail explained that collegiality must be preserved to protect the justice system. He said targeting peers would create hostility, damage trust, and cause the system to collapse.
The ruling also clarified judicial accountability. While judges have immunity for judicial and administrative work, misconduct allegations must go to the Supreme Judicial Council. Justice Mandokhail cited Article 209 of the Constitution, which gives the SJC exclusive authority. He added that past exceptions, like the Iftikhar Chaudhry case, cannot justify such practices now.
The judgment further emphasized discipline in handling cases. Justice Mandokhail said part-heard cases should not be transferred unless lawfully allowed. However, if legislation removes a court’s jurisdiction during a pending case, that court must stop proceedings immediately. He also warned that judges cannot “pick and choose” cases, as it would damage discipline.
Read more: Imran alleges NAB acting as tool of establishment
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court confirmed that petitions filed by five Islamabad High Court judges are still under review. The judges challenged the administrative powers of the IHC chief justice, arguing they undermine judicial authority. The Court said their pleas remain in normal scrutiny and will be decided in due course. The ruling reaffirms that the Supreme Judicial Council remains the only body to handle judicial misconduct.