Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, has criticized the emerging US-Iran agreement, calling it “very bad” for Israel as well as for the United States and Gulf states. His comments reflect growing regional unease over the framework deal announced during the G7 summit in France.
Speaking in an interview with Israeli media, Danon said the interim arrangement could strengthen Iran’s position by accelerating negotiations without securing firm long-term guarantees. He argued that rushing the diplomatic process may undermine security interests of key regional allies.
Danon, however, noted that the situation remains fluid and no final agreement has been reached. He said the current understanding is only a framework and further negotiations are still required before any binding deal is finalized.
The criticism comes amid broader international debate over the US-Iran understanding. US President Donald Trump has described the arrangement as a conditional memorandum of understanding, saying it could be reversed if Iran fails to comply with its terms.
Trump has also warned that military action remains an option if Tehran does not meet expectations under the agreement. The remarks underline continuing uncertainty around the deal’s durability and its implications for regional stability.