• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Monday, June 8, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

SC seeks responses from parties on JIT report in Pakpattan case

Published on: May 16, 2019 2:18 AM

The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday sought response from the respondents on the joint investigation team (JIT) report in Pakpattan shrine land allotment case within 15 days.

At the beginning of the hearing, Justice Umar Atta Bandial asked whether the allotted land was property of the Auqaf Department or the government.

To this, a private land owner’s lawyer, Iftikhar Gilani, replied that the Auqat only takes care of the land and doesn’t own it. “I have submitted my reservations and response on the JIT report,” Gilani said. Justice Bandial remarked that how a chief minister could hand over the land to a private man after signing a summary?

Former Punjab governor Rafique Rajwana showed up before the SC on behalf of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in the case.

“The land was handed over to the caretaker of the shrine to only look after it, but he sold it,” Rajwana told the court in his arguments. My counsel had nothing to do with this matter, he continued.

Justice Bandial in his remarks said the land was allotted through a summary signed by the then chief minister, which was in clear violation of the court orders.

The judge, seeking reply from the respondents on the JIT report, later adjourned the hearing of the case until after Eid.

The court issued notices to Nawaz Sharif, the attorney general and others to appear in person or through their lawyers for the hearing of the case.

It is noteworthy that the JIT constituted to probe the Pakpattan shrine land case against deposed Nawaz Sharif had held him responsible for “illegally transferring” shrine land when he was the chief minister of Punjab in 1985.

Last year, on December 13, the top court constituted a JIT to probe the illegal transfer of 14,394 kanals of land belonging to the Auqaf Department in Pakpattan district.

Background:

After the partition, Dewan Ghulam Qutab and his family used to be the ‘owners’ of the shrine’s land as per the revenue record from 1947 to 1958.

The family sold pieces of the land to different people until January 1, 1970, when the Punjab government notified the Auqaf Department as the rightful owner of the land and the Dewans the custodian of the shrine. Later, the Dewans moved the Lahore High Court but the case was decided against them.

In 1986, the government withdrew its 1970 notification and the Dewans reciprocated by withdrawing their appeal before the Lahore High Court against the decision.

With this, the Dewans resumed their land selling business and the Revenue Department issued ownership rights (fard) to all buyers.

In the meantime, a 1981 case regarding 17 marlas of land filed in a civil court reached the Supreme Court by 2015.

The apex court chief justice took suo motu of the land deals of the shrine and summoned officials of the Revenue and Auqaf departments and the Dewans.

After some hearings, the Supreme Court declared the notification of August 28, 1986, illegal and nullified all land deals done since then. The decision reportedly affected 100,000 residents of different localities.

The Dewans filed a review petition last year in defence of their right to sell the land with the Supreme Court against its 2015 decision, which remained pending since then.

Former chief justice Mian Saqib Nisar, during his visit to the Baba Farid shrine in 2018, had promised justice in the case when dozens of the affected people raised slogans to get his attention towards their plight.

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: Headline, jit report, Pakpattan, parties, responses, SC seeks

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Mahira Khan reacts to acid attack on Quetta doctor, calls incident ‘barbaric’

Taylor Swift becomes richest female musician in history as net worth hits $2 billion

Lily Collins brings ‘Emily in Paris’ charm to French Open

Kim Kardashian cheers on Lewis Hamilton amid growing romance

Momina Iqbal’s rukhsati date revealed by sister

Pakistan

GB polling concludes peacefully: PPP, PML-N and PTI claim leads

Government warns against attempts to fuel unrest in AJK

Bilawal calls for dialogue to resolve AJK political crisis, meeting with PM likely

27 terrorists killed in North Waziristan IBOs: ISPR

Naqvi meets FM Araghchi, delivers CDF Munir’s message to Khamenei

More Posts from this Category

Business

Businesswomen call for economic inclusion, increased opportunities in budget discussions

OPEC+ agrees fourth oil quota hike since Hormuz closure

Global airlines slash 2026 profit forecast on fuel shock from Iran war

Economic pressure rises as joblessness hits record level, inflation shows no relief: BMP

‘FPCCI budget proposals can attract investment’

More Posts from this Category

World

Trump calls for more ‘surgical’ strikes against Hezbollah

42nd anniversary of Operation Blue Star: Stark reminder of Indian state’s tyranny towards Sikhs

Israel kills nine in Gaza as Egypt hosts new ceasefire talks

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.